I’ve always been in an inner debate in regards to the potential of democracy. I believe there is a number threshold for a democracy, after which there will be a constant opposition to each other. Considering the example of India, the sheer size, diversity and distribution (economic, class, education) always leads to a compromise of sorts that are not beneficial to all. Is there a point where meritocracy is more valuable than democracy, a question that’s been keeping me up at night.